259) and third (p. 271) dilutions, no doubt, on Hahnemann's
famous principle, with an increase of potency at each dilution.
Probably the supposed transmutation is _per saltus_. "Homoeopathic
doses of transmutation," indeed! Well, if we really must swallow
transmutation in some form or other, as this reviewer intimates, we
might prefer the mild homoeopathic doses of Darwin's formula to the
allopathic bolus which the Edinburgh general practitioner appears to
be compounding.]
[Footnote 2: Vide _North American Review_, for April, 1860, p. 475,
and _Christian Examiner_, for May, p. 457.]
[Footnote 3: Page 188, English ed.]
[Footnote 4: In _American Journal of Science_, July, 1860, pp. 148,
149.]
[Footnote 5: In _Contributions to the Nat. Hist. of U. S._, Vol. i.
pp. 128, 129.]
[Footnote 6: _Contr. Nat. Hist. U.S._, Vol. i. p. 130; and _Amer.
Journal of Science_, July, 1860, p. 143.]
[Footnote 7: _North American Review_, for April, 1860, p. 506.]
[Footnote 8: _Vide_ mottoes to the second edition of Darwin's work.]
[Footnote 9: _North American Review_, l.c. p. 504.]
[Footnote 10: _North American Review_, l.c. p. 487, _et passim._]
[Footnote 11: _In American Journal of Science_, July, 1860, p. 143.]
[Footnote 12: _Vide_ article by Mr. C. Wright, in the _Mathematical
Monthly_ for May last.]
[Footnote 13: Vide _Edinburgh Review_ for January, 1860, article on
"Acclimatization," etc.]
[Footnote 14: _Contributions; Essay on Classification_, etc.
Pages:
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113